Saylor proposed five rights to digital assets, opening the way for 10 million companies to raise capital.

Michael Saylor, president of Strategy suggested that society adopt a "digital copyright law" to protect individuals and companies from using more digital assets, arguing that regulations alone may not be enough for economic growth in the age of artificial intelligence. The proposal appeared in an article published on June 26, as reported by Cointelegraph.

What's the offer?

The issue that Seiler prioritized first was the right to create new digital assets, and he argued that an enabling environment for creating and deploying digital assets should enable 10 million startups to raise capital.

Talking about "rights" instead of just talking about "prohibitions", makes the proposal look like a whole new regulatory landscape, where governments and societies have to consider who can create, use or trade digital assets under what conditions and how they should be protected.

Why is this important in the age of artificial intelligence?

Artificial intelligence-driven economies often require digital infrastructure, data and flexible funding models. Digital assets may be viewed as more than just a commodity to buy in the marketplace because they can act as an intermediary for demonstrating rights, accessing services or conducting transactions across systems.

As technology rapidly expands, rules-based regulation may not keep pace with new business models, so Saylor's proposal reflects an effort to create a policy language that focuses on both permission and consumer protection rather than blocking or letting markets operate without standards.

For readers in Thailand, how should this look?

For readers in Thailand, this proposal is indicative information and not an immediate binding law. The use of digital assets in the country still falls under the jurisdiction of the Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) ( the SEC (Thailand) ) and local platforms such as Bitkub for trading Thai baht.

The issue that needs to be addressed is not the price of individual assets, but how rights to create or use digital technologies are guaranteed, who's responsible when things go wrong and how new regulations will allow for safe funding for start-ups.

Questions to be asked.

Proposals for a Digital Copyright Act suggest that the digital asset industry is moving from price debates to more debate about the structure of the digital economy and user rights.

The challenge is to put this idea into practice: it must be clear who owns the rights to create digital assets, how much transparency and consumer protection standards there are, and not allowing new venture funding to become a loophole for fraud.

Reading Saylor's proposal, the reader might conclude that this is more about opening up a conversation on the future of digital ecosystems than providing answers to market pricing.