The founders of Cardano believe that Project Midnight has a greater potential for growth than Zcash .

Charles Hoskinson, the founder of Cardano, saw Midnight as potentially bigger than Sea Catch.

What's the latest movement?

According to a report from Siam Blockchain Charles Hoskinson, the founder of Cardano suggested that Project Midnight had greater growth potential than Zcash , this issue became interesting because both names were among privacy-focused projects but with different paths and contexts for growth.

Why is this important to the blockchain industry?

Charles Hoskinson's remarks are not only the personal opinion of a long-time crypto entrepreneur, but also reflect the views of technology leaders on the direction of the Cardano ecosystem. The key point is that privacy and verifiability are two things often discussed together in the blockchain industry, especially when the technology has been put to practical use by public and private organizations.

Zcash has a business reputation for protecting user privacy, but projects of this nature are often monitored by regulatory agencies because too much privacy can be used inappropriately. Midnight is seen as an attempt to create privacy in contexts that may address more systemic usage challenges such as data protection, access rights management and the development of applications requiring trade secrets.

What's the difference between Midnight and Sea Cache?

Zcash is a blockchain-based transaction privacy network. Users can choose to conduct transactions in an open or hidden manner, with technology that helps verify the transaction without revealing all of the information. Midnight focuses on data privacy and uses Cardano's ecosystem which may encompass more than just transferring money or sending transactions over blockchains.

The key difference is that Zcash has a digital asset and network status that emphasizes privacy directly, while Midnight was discussed as a project that could potentially strengthen Cardano's capabilities in terms of applications requiring data confidentiality, privacy protection, and infrastructure for developers. Although both have the same word "privacy", their usage goals and ecosystem contexts are different.

How should readers in Thailand and the region view this?

For Thai readers, this issue is not just a comparison between projects but also looks beyond the the SEC (Thailand) framework. Because digital assets and privacy-related projects may have different legal or regulatory statuses depending on services and platforms, users of domestic platforms such as Bitkub or service providers registered in Thailand should verify that the properties or tokens involved are regulated before considering access to any services.

In regional contexts, including users in Myanmar and neighboring countries, access to exchange services, digital asset transfers, and privacy projects can be affected by regulatory constraints, infrastructure, and policies of each country. So Midnight News grew more than Zcash , so it's worth looking at the technological developments and competitiveness of its ecosystem rather than seeing them as a sign of value or use that is certain.

Here's what you need to know before following this story.

What's worth keeping an eye on is Midnight's progress in real-world deployments, developer adoption, connectivity to the Cardano ecosystem, system security audits, user acceptance and regulatory attitudes in each country. Zcash remains a user-driven project with a strong reputation for privacy so it should be monitored how both networks develop technology, actual usage and further regulation.

Also, the reader should distinguish between "individual belief in a project" and "actual growth outcomes", because Charles Hoskinson's statement may reflect the direction of the Cardano community but it cannot be confirmed whether Midnight will become more popular than Zcash projects in the future.